Cryptographic funds and market manufacturers are buying tokens with pronounced discounts through private free sale agreements and covering them with shorts, blocking two -digit yields while retail merchants risk.
Risk capitalists, market funds and manufacturers can often ensure allocations with approximately 30% discount with the award of three to four months, then coverage when shortening the same amount in the markets of perpetual futures, according to Jelle Buth, co -founder of the Mercado Enfix manufacturer.
This structure largely guarantees profits that can annouricize up to 60%-120%, regardless of where the token price moves.
Buth said that Enfux also participates in such agreements, describing them as a popular practice for projects to collect capital and for investors to block yields. Retail merchants who are excluded from these arrangements have the sale pressure when hedges and unlocks reach the market.
“I would never like to be retail again,” Buth told Cointelegraph.
How Token OTC agreements work for markets and market manufacturers
Free sales offers (OTC) are naturally the market against retail merchants, not only because of the sale pressure that affects token prices, but also because they lack transparency for a general investor to make informed decisions, Buth said.
This is how an OTC sample could develop.
An institutional investor participates in a $ 500,000 agreement as part of an increase of $ 10 million.
The investment is made through a tokens purchase with a 30% discount with a four -month award period.
To protect against pricing volatility, the investor opens a short -lived alpador of equal size in futures markets.
Price changes are compensated, while the built -in discount is blocked in their profits once the tokens unlocked.
Because the 30% gain is carried out for four months, the returns are annualized to 90% APy.
In traditional finance, companies must reveal fund collection events through regulatory presentations. If experts or institutional investors receive discount assignments, they usually appear in public presentations.
“The coverage funds have long bought in the convertibles with a discount and neutralized their risk when shortening the underlying action. The practice is not illegal, but in actions, it is within a thick wall of dissemination rules and commercial restrictions,” Yuriy Brisov, partner of the digital and analog partners, told Cointelegraph.
Related: Firedance will accelerate Solana, but will not reach the whole potential
In Crypto, projects do not always reveal these terms. The ads often claim that a project has raised $ x million, but omits that it came with discount tokens and short -award periods.
“The OTC with discount assignments are one of Crypto’s worst secret secrets,” Cointelegraph Douglas Colckit, a founding collaborator of the Layer-1 Fogo block chain, told Cointegraph Douglas Colckitt.
“If you are exchanging a token and does not know that there is a paper battery that can be abandoned with a discount, it is only blinding. Retail trade ends absorbing the sales pressure, while experts block trades without risks. That asymmetry is brutal.”
On paper, OTC discounts plus coverage seem risks. But in practice, perpetual future can also work against investors.
Unlike traditional futures contracts, Perses do not expire. The merchants who have them must pay or receive a financing rate. When ALPS prices are negotiated above the spot price, the shorts pay long to maintain their position. That cost can be constantly moving on the margin of gains of discount tokens.
“It also has an opportunity cost,” said Crypto Management Platform Glider, Brian Huang, Cointelegraph. “That money could also be reversed in another place during the acquisition period.”
Why OTC remains the norm despite retail disadvantages
Despite the disadvantages for retail trade, OTC Token agreements remain entrenched because they serve both sides of the agreement.
For projects, private tokens sales are a quick way of ensuring millions in funds without the volatility of downloading tokens directly in the market. They provide a track for the development of products, marketing or repurchase to help support the price of the token once the unlocks arrive.
Related: Market manufacturers offers are silently killing cryptographic projects
For funds and market manufacturers, they can deploy capital in tokens with predictable yields instead of blocking money in previous capital or capital rounds.
Coverage with perpetual future reduces exposure to market changes, and the incorporated discount guarantees a profit margin if financing rates do not eat it.
“Many VC do not even bother the pre-semilla: they prefer liquid agreements or tokens of established projects that can be traded immediately,” Buth said. “When the agreements come with 12 or 24 months awards, it is much more difficult to close those rounds because the blockages are too long and the returns do not comply with that 60% -80% of APy threshold that investors expect.”
Ultimately, OTC agreements persist because they align incentives for those who control the greatest amount of money in cryptography. The projects obtain instant liquidity, the funds obtain high performance operations, and retail investors are reacting to price movements without seeing the terms that molded them.
Democratization of OTC agreements for retail participants
The fundamental objective of a company is to benefit. Buth said he doesn’t blame projects for offering OTC offers, or funds to take them. Enflux, like other market manufacturers, is simply “playing game.” Instead, he suggested that retail merchants should understand what they are negotiating, since such agreements lack the transparency of mature industries.
Colkitt said the consequences go further. He said OTC Coverage and allocations with discount distort token prices, creating a sales pressure that looks like a weak demand.
“It is not the market to decide that the project is bad. At the end of the day, it is the mechanics of these agreements in themselves,” he said.
Meanwhile, such agreements appear more and more on fund collection platforms that allow retail investors to participate in agreements once inaccessible. Huang said the industry should expect an expansion of such places.
Huang gave a different opinion by arguing that transparency is not the problem. “The whole purpose of these agreements is to have tokens exchange hands without a great impact on the price of Token,” he said. Instead, it suggests that new companies should prevent VC from being secondary tokens sales.
For now, the imbalance persists against retail merchants. The OTC Token agreements continue to give predictable profits and funds, while the retail sector remains on the losing side of a game that never agreed to play.
The best thing that retail merchants can do is recognize asymmetry, take into account the hidden sales pressure and adjust their strategies with the knowledge that they are negotiating against investors who have discount batteries.
Magazine: What do Crypto market manufacturers really do? Liquidity or manipulation
