AI de Agent Eliza Labs project has filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk’s XAI, claiming that the company’s company dedicated itself to monopolistic practices aimed at “deplatifying” the launch of AI of AI.
He lawsuit He affirms that Xai tried to “extract” valuable information, including the technical figures of documentation and use related to the development of the Eliza Labs platform, to copy their ideas before “banishing” Eliza Labs de XAI.
Eliza Labs co -founder Shaw Walters argues in the demand that the relationship between the two companies began friendly, with Xai inviting Walters to share ideas. He also said they were based on the XAI Application Programming Interface (API) because it was free. Walters added:
“The collaborative tone became transactional, just like X launched ANI and a new version of Grok. Suddenly, they demanded that we pay $ 50,000 a month for a business license, $ 600,000 a year, or face legal actions.
We were already paying more than $ 20,000 annually through several licenses and rates, ”Walters continued. Cointelegraph contacted Walters, but refused to provide more comments.
The demand highlights the litigious nature of the artificial intelligence sector, as legal actions continue to accumulate monopolistic practices, intellectual property rights and legal responsibilities of AI service providers.
Related: Eliza Labs launches Auto.fun, a turn of the without code in the pump.
The demands are mounted in the nascent sector
The AI industry is still in its childhood, with key regulatory and legal questions without response about nascent technology.
These regulatory gray areas exist together with the legal problems that technological companies, such as the registered trademark and the violation of patents, face, which makes the AI sector a mature battlefield for litigation.
In February 2024, Elon Musk filed a lawsuit against Sam Altman, the founder of Openai, and OpenAi, on the company’s proposal to become a profit company.
Musk argued that the company left its original mission as a non -profit and open source project that would create tools for the public good.
The lawsuit retired several months later, in June, but withdrew without prejudice, which means that Musk can continue to reintroduce the demand until it is dismissed or withdrawn with detriment.
In July 2024, the New York Times sued OpenAI for the use of copyright material in the company of great language (LLM) of the company (LLM), Chatgpt, demanding that a detailed source material for the content generated by AI is provided.
XAI, a game company centered on Ethereum, demanded the violation of the XAI brands of Elon Musk in August 2025, claiming that the similarity of the registered trademarks has confused consumers and has damaged their business.
Magazine: Everyone hates GPT-5, the AI shows social networks cannot be solved: ai eye
