Economist Alex Krüger dismissed concerns about the end of the cryptography cycle, arguing that the general bassist feeling creates a opposite purchase opportunity as markets prepare for recovery.
In a position on August 30, Krüger said that “most cryptographic graphics now look so broken that they are optimistic”, citing significant long liquidations as evidence of capitulation.
The economist positioned himself bullish for next week after experiencing losses previously in the negotiation session.
Krüger noted that the recent market decrease mainly affected Bitcoin and Ethereum, while Altcoins stopped colliding in the session. He added that such divergence often indicates the next force,
He stressed that optimal purchase opportunities arise “when everyone is panic, and not when we are all celebrating.”
The economist expects market volatility to persist until the next meeting of the Federal Reserve, pointing out that a rate cut is still an incomplete price in current valuations. Even with the possible downward risks, Krüger expressed “extreme confidence that this is not the end of the cycle.”
No displacement tops for now
When asked about the longevity of the cycle without a displacement lid, Krüger explained his thesis “Super Cycle”. This framework provides key assets that continue higher with “smaller sauces and a lower slope” instead of traditional manic races followed by important corrections.
Krüger does not anticipate a displacement top in 2025, citing insufficient conditions for the main manic movements, possibly for Solana due to accumulated demand.
In addition, he projected that changes in the composition of the Federal Reserve in 2026 could trigger the next peak of the next important upward market.
Unlike the bearish commentators who suggest excessive optimism requires crushing, Krüger evaluated the current feeling as balanced, with quite represented bullish and bass perspectives.
‘Statistical nonsense’
He dismissed the bassist seasonality of September as “statistical nonsense” of patterns’ search behavior instead of significant market conditions. He expects trade to alternate between long and short liquidations until the political decisions of the Fed establish a clear tendency.
Although he acknowledged that a 25 basic points cut would not surprise the markets, he questioned whether it could serve as a catalyst that can trigger the upper displacement that predicts many analysts.
Krüger then highlighted the bias options that the data they show place the trade in the premiums to the calls, indicating a position driven by fear. This technical configuration, combined with sales pressure promoted by liquidation, creates conditions that favor the opposite positioning.
The economist’s analysis suggests that current market weakness represents temporary volatility instead of a structural decomposition, positioning the market for recovery as liquidation clarifies weak hands.
